Just let them believe it was their idea and it's cool.
Great news, I doubt the ACC will require all 15 if they have 14 and Duke, North Carolina, Clemson, and Florida State all on board. 5 years seems like the perfect commitment. If the old guard demands Greensboro, and the new guard all want MSG. Just rotate Greensboro/MSG. Honestly, since 1990 only 4 non-Duke/North Carolina teams have the ACC Tournament Georgia Tech 1990, 1993 Wake Forest 1995, 1996, Maryland 2004, Florida State 2012.
The Catholic 7 and the ACC could rotate at MSG and both conferences would end up with the World's Most Famous Arena.
The ACC needs to out compete the B1G, the NNNNNNBE and the C7 for the NYC metro TV market. Only makes sense to "box out" the B1G and play the tournament there. Should crush them, numbers wise, even if every Rutgers fans leaves their TV sets on.
They might not have a choice after a few years of a 1/3 full "Big East Tournament"
They may have the leverage, but their playing two pair (Big East)against a full house(ACC). (pun intended)why would MSG agree to a rotation when they have an annual commitment in the bag? They have the leverage and would demand a bigger piece of the pie to make it worth their while.
the odds are against a rotation that includes MSG
They may have the leverage, but their playing two pair (Big East)against a full house(ACC). (pun intended)
Big East - MSG and United Center (Chicago Bulls Arena)
ACC - Greensboro Coliseum and MSG
I think people underestimate how much leverage MSG has - every conference wants to penetrate the NYC market, wouldn't shock me if the Big 10 made a play to hold their tourney at the Garden. At that point does the ACC hold the line on wanting a rotation, or do they try to lock up MSG?