Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="nzm136, post: 3639717, member: 2531"]
This post is a microcosm of why I don’t think you understand basic concepts.

There was no work to do. A poster posted stats that weren’t comparable, and I pointed it out. I wasn’t taking a position about how good our DC is. Well supported or not, the guy’s conclusion could have been right. I don’t know, and I don’t take speculative positions.

Since I wasn’t taking a position on who the better OC was, there were no stats to pull. My only position was the use of numbers (that you routinely abuse). That argument (should be) obvious on its face, and it has been demonstrated countless times, both inside and outside of this forum.

If you want me to jog your memory about a specific instance, I’d be happy to do it. Remember that discussion that we had about offenses where you held firm about DB’s early offenses being significantly better than SS’ only to realize that, after pace adjusting, SS’ offenses were slightly better? If you can’t remember when it happened, it was roughly around the time that you started going on your crusade about strength of schedules (presumably to get around the flip in numbers).

Pace adjusting matters, and it matters a lot when you compare fast pace offenses with traditional offenses and/or slow offenses (see the above paragraph).
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?