x
DomeStranger All Conference Joined Aug 27, 2011 Messages 3,717 Like 4,015 Feb 8, 2012 #2 I think that may have been why Scoop was so aggressive on the steal, he gets the steal or gets called for the foul. Win/Win situation.
I think that may have been why Scoop was so aggressive on the steal, he gets the steal or gets called for the foul. Win/Win situation.
B bpo57 Living Legend Joined Nov 17, 2011 Messages 19,473 Like 12,855 Feb 8, 2012 #3 No because of the way we rebound it would have been risky. A made first FT and a putback could easily have happened.
No because of the way we rebound it would have been risky. A made first FT and a putback could easily have happened.
raf4488 Starter Joined Aug 27, 2011 Messages 1,896 Like 3,519 Feb 8, 2012 #4 With 2-3 seconds left, I'll give them a 60-70 footer instead of a chance for a free throw putback to tie it.
With 2-3 seconds left, I'll give them a 60-70 footer instead of a chance for a free throw putback to tie it.
StopCoolio 2nd String Joined Aug 17, 2011 Messages 729 Like 2,743 Feb 8, 2012 #5 DomeStranger said: I think that may have been why Scoop was so aggressive on the steal, he gets the steal or gets called for the foul. Win/Win situation. Expand... Agree with this. All the guards were very aggressive on that last possession. Really no downside to doing that as they won't get a great look and if they foul, meh.
DomeStranger said: I think that may have been why Scoop was so aggressive on the steal, he gets the steal or gets called for the foul. Win/Win situation. Expand... Agree with this. All the guards were very aggressive on that last possession. Really no downside to doing that as they won't get a great look and if they foul, meh.
jcuse44 2nd String Joined Aug 26, 2011 Messages 922 Like 251 Feb 8, 2012 #6 no, if we foul and they hit one and miss and get rebound they can still win it.