Who cares...Duncan is a complete moron. Part of the Chicago cartel.Yeah, what next...
Yeah, what next...
. When a sec of education says something about your basketball coach, it's very bad.Who cares...Duncan is a complete moron. Part of the Chicago cartel.
. When a sec of education says something about your basketball coach, it's very bad.
Yes, he's not talking to/about reporters.Agreed. Jb has to shut the h#%^ up. Like yesterday.
I've worked in education for three decades...Duncan is an a$$clown who is riding his Chicago connections for all they're worth.. When a sec of education says something about your basketball coach, it's very bad.
Agreed, one of many.it's one of the departments that should be abolished.
AgreedAgreed, one of many.
But in the meantime, Boeheim would do well to keep his trap shut. Discretion, JB, discretion.
According to Christine Brennan of USA Today, if next years APR standards were applied to this years field, the following teams would be ineligible: UConn, SU, Florida St, Indiana. S. Miss, St. Louis, Colorado, Colorado St., Miss. Valley St, New Mexico St., Norfolk St., Ohio and Bona. That's almost a whole bracket!Did Kevin Harlan also say something about Cuse being ineligble next year due to APR, I swear Harlan made that statement.
According to Christine Brennan of USA Today, if next years APR standards were applied to this years field, the following teams would be ineligible: UConn, SU, Florida St, Indiana. S. Miss, St. Louis, Colorado, Colorado St., Miss. Valley St, New Mexico St., Norfolk St., Ohio and Bona. That's almost a whole bracket!
JB's complaint is that no consideration is taken for students who leave to go pro and that the pros run their draft camp DURING school months which obligies kids to miss school to attend. Any other student who leaves school to earn a living doesn't impact the school, so why should atheletes.
The guys left in good standing. I guess it's easy to take your basket weaving projects on the road with you.How the heck would Kentucky be eligible??
Any other student who leaves school to earn a living doesn't impact the school, so why should atheletes.
whats worse? the sec of education discussing a private college's bball coach? or the actual department of education?
OK, so a member of an ultra-liberal president's cabinet to criticize (most likely WITHOUT the facts - why does that sound familiar?) the performance of "white guys" (my words) like Boeheim working at private entities (like SU/NCAA) that operate on a for-profit basis, but when it's about the poor performance of a minority woman, running a failing publicly funded institution (like DC schools) - that same cabinet member goes to bat for her.
Yeah, I get it.