Just like the offense...small, yearly improvements. The defensive side of this cake is also not finished baking yet.Now the only part I feel he misled us on is the defense being relentless. I do see we are venturing out of the Tampa 2 more than we are in it which is really good but when do we become Clemson relentless. Force offenses to change. Be aggressive.
If we can make the ground shake...we will KILL them!I have that "big game" feeling this morning.
With the 7 pm start, the chance to lock in a bowl, the extra mood enhancement a late start provides, 41,000 fans, Its going to be LOUD !!!!
Now the only part I feel he misled us on is the defense being relentless. I do see we are venturing out of the Tampa 2 more than we are in it which is really good but when do we become Clemson relentless. Force offenses to change. Be aggressive.
Someone needs to get on their movie clip game. I feel like there have to be countless applicable clips.I will be loud - that I can promise.
I would think the O would take longer develop than the D.Just like the offense...small, yearly improvements. The defensive side of this cake is also not finished baking yet.
3-0's on O strain the D. The two are very related IMHO.I would think the O would take longer develop than the D.
The talent is, but not the scheme. The scheme is a wobbling duck3-0's on O strain the D. The two are very related IMHO.
Our D is better than many people think.
We must have different standards. I would have absolutely agreed with you in year #1. But I thought that last year's defense was incredibly improved, and I think that this year's defense is even better. I'm not quite sure that our LB corps is where it needs to be, but our secondary is great through my eyes, as is the DL. I think that we're very good at stopping the pass, we're solid on 3rd down, and we can put pressure on the QB. A little more weight in the pants, and I think that we'll be able to stop the run as well.The talent is, but not the scheme. The scheme is a wobbling duck
Look at the yardage and scoring defense numbers. Compare them to up tempo teams that are successful. Our numbers are not good. Turnover improvement is due to talent. Same goes for third down efficiency and red zone efficiency (DL). Our talent is outperforming the scheme. Our real numbers stink still. Team will never win nine games or more with the 70th ranked scoring defense in the country.We must have different standards. I would have absolutely agreed with you in year #1. But I thought that last year's defense was incredibly improved, and I think that this year's defense is even better. I'm not quite sure that our LB corps is where it needs to be, but our secondary is great through my eyes, as is the DL. I think that we're very good at stopping the pass, we're solid on 3rd down, and we can put pressure on the QB. A little more weight in the pants, and I think that we'll be able to stop the run as well.
I wouldn't when the hc is dino babers.I would think the O would take longer develop than the D.
Who are you comparing the numbers to?Look at the yardage and scoring defense numbers. Compare them to up tempo teams that are successful. Our numbers are not good. Turnover improvement is due to talent. Same goes for third down efficiency and red zone efficiency (DL). Our talent is outperforming the scheme. Our real numbers stink still. Team will never win nine games or more with the 70th ranked scoring defense in the country.
WVU, WSU, and Baylor at similar points in their installments. Our scheme is not good, our talent is.Who are you comparing the numbers to?
And last I saw, we were in the low 60’s for most metrics (not pace adjusted). Pace adjust and account for the added stress in the D from the offense, and I can see ya being in the 40’s. At least in my head, that puts us between the top half of teams and the top 3rd of teams. That’s not elite, but it’s certainly not bad.
I think that the D went out of their way to make me sound dumb today. But then they came together when they needed to. I'm honestly not sure what to make of it.WVU, WSU, and Baylor at similar points in their installments. Our scheme is not good, our talent is.