dinosaurbbq
2nd String
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 715
- Like
- 420
The usually sit them because the danger to the program and university is too great to not do anything. It also sends a message that you can do these things without repercussions - which may lead to more of the same behavior. It's not a right to play D1 football. If you don't want to sit, don't do stupid illegal things.
This case kind of proves all that.
If I had a daughter and their were no repercussions and he friend got assaulted the next week, I'd be all over the school for not protecting its students better.
"If you don't want to sit, don't do stupid illegal things" -- how does that apply to a scenario where a player is wrongly accused and did nothing, but sits because an accusation has been made? Don't you have a problem with that?