Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Beginning to come to light: ACCnetwork go decision by early 2016
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 1110572, member: 622"] Again, this is where age may be the issue. Clemson won a national title, 1981, which in and of itself is a very high distinguishing credit. Clemson wins big games and wins bowl games. Clemson does not always choke, as does VATech. Yes, VATech had the better record for their first decade in the ACC compared to Clemson, but before that Clemson was light years ahead of VATech. Additionally, this proves my point that Beamer is an opportunist, he wins when teams are down and against weak teams but he fails to win the big games, which earns respect outside of a teams normal circles, read nationally. However, the last couple of years Clemson is by far a much stronger team than VATech. To further my point, under your analysis, VATech should be dominating Syracuse because Syracuse went through the down period, stating shortly after Big East football formed. However, VATech at their best is even with Syracuse during a down period, 6-6 during the Big East years, the same period you anoint VATech the team the football prophecies say will carry the ACCN. You can believe that VATech carries weight nationally. That is your viewpoint. My viewpoint is otherwise and is based on the facts that I have lived mostly outside of ACC territory for nearly 25 years in several states and within the other conference territories. VATech does not strike fear in any power team. Teamss that do not win big games and win bowl games and play pansy schedules do not get respect. GATech even won a championship in 1990. Another proof of what people think is this link: [url]http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3842161[/url] These are the Prestige Rankings: Syracuse 29th, VATech 37th. The list was compiled in 2009 when Syracuse was still digging out of the depths of our despair and VATech was riding at their peak! Anyway, time to focus on the ACCN. Mods, we may need a VATech bashing thread. Perhaps a bashing thread for each ACC team? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Beginning to come to light: ACCnetwork go decision by early 2016
Top
Bottom