Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Big 12 to expand...or not
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Ottoble, post: 1823046, member: 2539"] I see your point on Houston, I just don't see it adding TV revenue and think that UT, Baylor, TCU, TT, are not in any hurry to add another team to recruit against in their state. Especially the Longhorns who I think have been hurt in the DFW & Houston areas already the by adding TCU and losing A&M to the recruiting draw of the SEC. [LIST=1] There is a reason TAMU, UT, TTech, took Baylor and left Rice, TCU, SMU and Houston behind when they left the SWC to join the Big 8 forming the Big 12. With big state school funding, State schools including Arkansas had become more dominant in the SWC in the 8os and 90s, except when SMU cheated (which is why people noticed they cheated when everyone else around them in the SWC was cheating too), following years of more balanced play or even some early eras of private school dominance. The 85 Scholarship limit went into effect in '92 and state schools were still at an advantage as they are today with funding, but it was becoming more level recruiting field since they couldn't take 35-40 players a year under previous limits of 105 and 95 which the private schools often couldn't afford to hit anyways previously except SMU. It concerned them and when Arkansas left for the SEC the conference was destabilized and the big state schools had their eyes open for options and $. To compete with the Big 8 State schools TAMU, UT, and TTech left with Baylor was their Patsy, they were the perennial bottom feeder in the SWC and was the only one of the 5 private schools that lacked geographical ties to the Major Metropolitan areas in Texas. Baylor would remain that way for a decade in the Big 12, has always had a recruiting disadvantage, and may go back down under new leadership. My Thoughts and I think its going to be 4 teams because $&TV&Recruiting make this carousel spin: [LIST=1] [*]Memphis (logical partner with UC and WVU), FedEx$ (Major City/State(s) added to TV) [*]Cincinnati (rival and geographic partner for WVU, also probably the most balanced program from a competitive nature) (Major City/State(s) added to TV) [*]BYU (fan base, national appeal, (Major City/State added to TV) BYU would normally be the #1 but they are just a little further away geographically. [*]UCF (recruiting, recent success) (Major City/State added to TV) [*]Colorado State (Geography, TV, BYU Partner) (But Likely doesn't draw deeply enough crowd or TV to warrant a bid.) [*]Houston (market, geography, rivalries) (But doesn't expand TV coverage and adds a more level recruiting playing field for the Cougars.) [/LIST] [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Big 12 to expand...or not
Top
Bottom