Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="senorpalmer, post: 3475182, member: 234"] He was a great, great talent but the results on the court matter, and the way his team went out that postseason without winning a game hurts his legacy, harsh as it may be. (Mike Edwards was a starter on that 91 team and incredibly frustrating, he should have been in a lesser role like he was the following season). Cant argue with him leaving when he did, but in the one year that it was his team, we got an ending that was embarrassing. If he had come back as a senior that team would have been excellent, with him, Johnson and Moten as the core, which was better than the 91 mix of players. They were a 6 seed without him, adding a potential national POY to the mix would have been significant. [/QUOTE]