Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off-Topic
Other Sports
Boxing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="JAXCUSE, post: 4000724, member: 516"] “What made the fight special was the guts the fighters showed.” I agree - and that’s what made number 3 the best of their trilogy. I think boxing is better when the heavyweights are competitive and exciting. An action packed championship fight was necessary and welcomed. Unlike Usyk/Joshua (more technical), this one appealed to the casual fan as well. Bottom line - Fury is just allot better all-around fighter than Wilder. He’s much bigger (which he uses to advantage well), but also much more versatile and skilled. And a better brawler…. While fun to watch, I thought the announcing team and internet world overhyped the fight’s place (excitement and skill perspective) in heavyweight history. It wasn’t Ali/Frazier or even Norton/Holmes or Holyfield/Bowe. I thought it was more a messy Holmes/Shavers II (early 80’s) - a great puncher/KO artist was losing to a more skilled champ, landed the big shot, created a dramatic moment and had a chance to finish. But the champ demonstrated why he was the champ - bit the mouthpiece, bought time, recovered and otherwise outclassed and pounded a very game and dangerous (but limited) challenger into submission. I thought Malik Scott (Wilder’s trainer now) improved Deontay’s craft for this one - more punch variety, taught him how to clinch/in fight more effectively along the ropes, spin off the opponent, etc. The bad habits (footwork, balance and wide punching) re-emerged under duress, but Wilder did better at close and midrange this time. Fury is just better at all of it (so that had allot to do with things). Deontay is 36 with nothing to prove. Hope he takes a long rest - deserves it. Joshua won’t fight him (chinny) and Usyk wants to unify with Tyson. Not many options other than well earned retirement. Fury looks and wins ugly, but I think he’s the best Heavyweight since Lennox. Unlike Joshua, he has that championship intangible (as does Usyk). He just wins. I’d pick him over Usyk (whom I like and respect very much) - too big and knows how to use it. Hope we get to see it next year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Off-Topic
Other Sports
Boxing
Top
Bottom