Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jdubs30, post: 2113364, member: 1620"] Wake and us have very contrasting resumes. They have a very "clean" resume. No bad losses, a lot of games vs. top competition and a good OOC slate. Good RPI and SOS. Ours is way more muddied. Its like I've been saying - it all depends on what the committee values. Wake is a safe choice. If the committee decides that big wins mean more than everything else, we will be in. If the committee prefers teams with no bad losses, good computer numbers, etc. Wake is much better. There's no reason we both can't be in - but it is very hard to compare us. It will come down to what the committee values. [/QUOTE]