Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="llandz, post: 4200225, member: 1679"]
Buddy was wrong, plain and simple. Guess who also was wrong, the officials. One will be there tomorrow, and one will not. I have to say, before hearing what Bilas had to say, I thought the suspension was warranted and fair. But Bilas lays out the facts very well along with an argument about the rules. If the ACC is changing the rules, that is not ok. Also, no one asked the ACC to review this other than the ESPN desk crew; not the player, not the Fl. St. coach and not the school. Also I listened to the video from the Fl St. player, and he also is pretty compelling in stating that this was basically a nothing, and that he has been hit much harder so many more times. He does not think this warrants a suspension either. In a court of law, he would be listened to. So it appears the ACC has just gone off on their own little tangent because a couple of ESPN announcers made this a really big deal right after the game. If they had done their due diligence and talked to the "offended victim" and the Fl. St. coach, then maybe they would have looked at this a bit differently.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?