Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Louie and Bouie, post: 4200401, member: 793"]
There was no flagrant foul called during the game so no automatic review for post-game suspension.  No in-game fighting so no review triggered by that. ACC, I guess, has the ability to review every game after they are over as to conduct warranting suspension. Not sure they do that so this seems to be a special circumstance based upon the nature of the game and the eyeballs on it.

Is this happening throughout the season where all games are reviewed after conclusion for suspendable conduct? Is review triggered by a complaint of one of the schools participating? That didn't happen here. Its questionable because its arbitrary. If its not consistently done throughout the season in the same manner its unfair.
 
Additionally, I haven't seen anyone reference an automatic suspension provision that the ACC used in this matter so its an subjective punishment which by definition could be argued and questioned.

Whether its a flagrant 1 or flagrant 2 is a red herring. Those are in game calls that can be reviewed and changed in game. This was a conduct call made after the game and not governed by those rules to my knowledge.

People obviously have their own opinions as exhibited here but the I'm 100% right, you're 100% wrong crew overstates their argument throughout this thread in my opinion.

If you dare disagree, they name call and shout you down. That is bothersome as I strongly believe its a subjective post-game call pressured by national media where reasonable minds could and have disagreed.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?