As someone who owns an RPI hockey sweatshirt, I greatly appreciate this post.Hartwick, St. Laurence and RPI have better D1 tradition than Buffalo. Its laughable that they think they're in the same conversation as SU. They're not even Cornell.
xc84 said:I am not sure why we "should". If I am from Rochester and go to school at Brockport, Niagara, Bonnies, Canisius, Nazareth, Fredonia, UB, or Buff St, etc... why would I want to affiliate with the private SU? Why would SU be my team? I don't know that it's a reasonable expectation.
Well they are obviously in much better shape than SU fans will admit. I think everyone, if they're honest will agree. UB sports are dramatically improving as a result of this flagship campaign.Funnier still: The post we put up about it on NunesMagician has turned into a pretty heated debate with UB fans. They don't agree with the "preeminent" wording (who could?), but they do believe they're in better shape than SU fans are willing to admit.
http://www.nunesmagician.com/2013/1...yracuse-orange-new-york-college-team#comments
That's ridiculous.Hartwick, St. Laurence and RPI have better D1 tradition than Buffalo. Its laughable that they think they're in the same conversation as SU. They're not even Cornell.
I don't see any improvement. Even if there is improvement, how do we know it's caused by Buffalo attempting to rebrand?Well they are obviously in much better shape than SU fans will admit. I think everyone, if they're honest will agree. UB sports are dramatically improving as a result of this flagship campaign.
That's ridiculous.
We all know the four money sports; Football, basketball, hockey and baseball.
UB won the MAC last year in baseball, nearly won their side of the MAC in football, have a chance with a new DUKE coach to potentially win the MAC in basketball...and are in the process of developing a Division 1 hockey team.
Saying Hartwick, St. LaWrence, and RPI in the same sentence as UB will be, and to me is, laughable.
I don't care what the cause is, improvement is improvement. The two main sports that this poll is obviously referring to is basketball and football.I don't see any improvement. Even if there is improvement, how do we know it's caused by Buffalo attempting to rebrand?
Trueblue25 said:That's ridiculous.
We all know the four money sports; Football, basketball, hockey and baseball.
UB won the MAC last year in baseball, nearly won their side of the MAC in football, have a chance with a new DUKE coach to potentially win the MAC in basketball...and are in the process of developing a Division 1 hockey team.
Saying Hartwick, St. LaWrence, and RPI in the same sentence as UB will be, and to me is, laughable.
Damn you for putting that song in my head. I need the Hüsker Dü version to cleanse.Trueblue25 is a UB student and pines for an SU v. UB rivalry. He won't pass up an opportunity to push for it. I am not criticizing. The kid's got spunk.
I would just like to point out that Hartwick has more D-1 national championships than Rutgers.Hartwick, St. Laurence and RPI have better D1 tradition than Buffalo. Its laughable that they think they're in the same conversation as SU. They're not even Cornell.
I would just like to point out that Hartwick has more D-1 national championships than Rutgers.
Edit - but I see NKR already kind of did.
Table Rock, the Brass Rail, cold pizza. It was all good.Go 'Wick!
Table Rock, the Brass Rail, cold pizza. It was all good.
Hartwick has a D1 championship in men's soccer and a total of 7 appearances in the Final Four. Even its fairly new D1 women's water polo team has a Final Four.
RPI men's hockey has 5 Frozen Four appearances and 2 championships.
SLU has 9 Frozen Fours in D1 hockey.
I don't think you can combine all of buffalo's programs to have the success, history and tradition of these programs at RPI, Hartwick and SLU. Does Buffalo athletics in its entire history have a Final Four in any sport, much less 5, 7 and 9 like these schools do?
I have a friend who is a huge Buffalo booster. He's always on the sideline and I see him on tv a lot when Buffalo plays. I have nothing against Buffalo, but what I said about tradition was 100% true.
P.S. I love that you brought in RPI, HArtwick and SLU.Hartwick has a D1 championship in men's soccer and a total of 7 appearances in the Final Four. Even its fairly new D1 women's water polo team has a Final Four.
RPI men's hockey has 5 Frozen Four appearances and 2 championships.
SLU has 9 Frozen Fours in D1 hockey.
I don't think you can combine all of buffalo's programs to have the success, history and tradition of these programs at RPI, Hartwick and SLU. Does Buffalo athletics in its entire history have a Final Four in any sport, much less 5, 7 and 9 like these schools do?
I have a friend who is a huge Buffalo booster. He's always on the sideline and I see him on tv a lot when Buffalo plays. I have nothing against Buffalo, but what I said about tradition was 100% true.
Their "problem" is WNYers hear UB and think of the university first and all it generates for the region, and the sports teams second or much later. Which, really, is how it should be.
The rebranding as New York thing is to differentiate the two but it seemed to turn off a lot of Buffalo folks (Talkin' Proud).
P.S. I love that you brought in RPI, HArtwick and SLU.
You are a true sports fan, I admire that a lot if it means anything.
You obviously love SU and there's nothing wrong with loving the place you go to school as well. There are days when, if I had to choose, I'd rather Hartwick win a soccer championship than SU win a football championship. Maybe 1/5 days, but it makes me kind of sad that all the D3 schools with one or two D1 sports are finding it so much harder to compete. And while blasphemous here, I respect the hell out of Hopkins for remaining relevant into this decade when so many others haven't known great success since the 80's.