orangefog
Certified Message Board Genius
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 18,843
- Like
- 61,555
Nice, Nap Siesta.I feel pretty strongly that he would fit great on our team because if you look at his name quick it looks like siesta.
Nice, Nap Siesta.I feel pretty strongly that he would fit great on our team because if you look at his name quick it looks like siesta.
Get his name to Wellman. Let the process begin.
Reading this board, I'm pretty sure they are way too busy just rolling the balls out to be paying attention to anything else.I’m sure the staff monitors the grad transfer portal.
This isn’t 1980. Or 1990. We don’t need a prototypical old school center. Just need a skilled big who can bang so it’s not 4 on 5.What? No, Smits is a much better fit. Smits is a true center from a D1 school.
A white onuaku?Sometimes I wonder what people are looking at. He may be undersized, but he knows how to seal, create space and use his feet in the post.
Those balls aren't going to roll themselves out... themselves.Reading this board, I'm pretty sure they are way too busy just rolling the balls out to be paying attention to anything else.
But what about defense? IMO, we need someone with some size, a potential defensive presence for center. This guy does not appear anywhere near 6'9. We're trying to replace/upgrade from PC, not Marek.This isn’t 1980. Or 1990. We don’t need a prototypical old school center. Just need a skilled big who can bang so it’s not 4 on 5.
Since PC won't be here, a better way of looking at it is -- is this guy better than Marek at the 5? Because that would allow MD to be on the wing where he is more comfortable.But what about defense? IMO, we need someone with some size, a potential defensive presence for center. This guy does not appear anywhere near 6'9. We're trying to replace/upgrade from PC, not Marek.
Bbased on your assessment, what level of play are we currently getting from the center position - high major, mid major or low mid major?But what about defense? IMO, we need someone with some size, a potential defensive presence for center. This guy does not appear anywhere near 6'9. We're trying to replace/upgrade from PC, not Marek.
We already have several forwards and have Marek as a converted forward into center for offensive purposes. Another undersized center would make SU midmajor like.
PC provides P5 level defense. We are losing him. Replacing him with a Patriot level mid major midget center seems like it would be a mistake.Bbased on your assessment, what level of play are we currently getting from the center position - high major, mid major or low mid major?
A mid-major center with body mass, decent hands, coordination and a jump shot would be an upgrade to what we've seen the last 2 seasons.
I think you are looking at it from the wrong angle. We're losing our best defensive center and we need to replace him. This guy looks like he'd get abused by ACC bigs. If we use our last scolie on another undersized center SU will be abused in the middle.Since PC won't be here, a better way of looking at it is -- is this guy better than Marek at the 5? Because that would allow MD to be on the wing where he is more comfortable.
I think I get the jab. AO created space through force and strength. This dude does it through technique. He is a post is the point I was making. He separates through a shoulder drop and fall away and has a good shooting touch. Knowing how to actually seal, which he does, and use your feet in the post are becoming a lost art. This kid would hirt us offensively in the middle. His game is throwback. A lot to divine from a few clips, but this is all bar room bamter, isn't it?A white onuaku?
When he can stay in the game longer than 15 minutes without picking up four dumb fouls for reaching. He also provides D3 offense. He turns the ball over at a rate of every other FGA, which is more than twice the rate similar players in conference. Chukwu isn't even that great at blocking shots or rebounding compared to other conference 4/5s.You gotta pick your poison. The only guy who is similar is Javen DeLaurier at Duke who is K's 7th option in a 6.5 man rotation.PC provides P5 level defense.
When he can stay in the game longer than 15 minutes without picking up four dumb fouls for reaching. He also provides D3 offense. He turns the ball over at a rate of every other FGA, which is more than twice the rate similar players in conference. Chukwu isn't even that great at blocking shots or rebounding compared to other conference 4/5s.You gotta pick your poison. The only guy who is similar is Javen DeLaurier at Duke who is K's 7th option in a 6.5 man rotation.
IMO, the okay defense doesn't overcome the negatives of having a non-entity, or worse, a liability on offense.
I guess I should prefaced that with "For what he gives back ..." and he gets a lot of fouls trying for blocks that he shouldn't and ends up out of the game where 7'2" on bench plays just like 5'2". His block percentage is similar to that of other bigs in conference play (where's not playing against 6'6" forwards), he's not dominating to make up for the lack of offensive ability.
Since 2009-10, in ACC play there have been 33 players with more than 10 blocks and a block percentage greater than 10%. Chukwu is 14th in block%, dead last in usage rate, close to last in TO% (and dead last for TOs relative to FGA). Blocks may end a specific shot, but they don't necessarily end the possession, TOs do. So while not every block is worth the same, every TO is bad. He's among the mid to worse for personal fouls per block, averages 1.2 PF/block this season. PFs also end the possession, but not in a good way. Compared to other players, he's not enough of an elite shot blocker to make up for his obvious faults.
I don't think that DBPM is a great stat for defense, it overinflates small counting stats (like blocks) with limited minutes (like what Chukwu plays).
If you consider the block to be the most important aspect of defense, then yeah, you could say that those are the 33 best defensive players. I don't.Is the takeaway from this supposed to be that of the 33 best defensive players in the ACC this decade
Lol..hes good enough to visit Kentucky but people on here think hes too small and mid majorish for us.
I totally get that. I also understand that we might not have any interest or maybe he doesnt see himself playing at Syracuse even if we were interested. That's different then what some of the comments are regarding him as a player. Kid is good and will be a big contributor wherever he goes. My guess he will love his kentucky visit...bucknell to Kentucky is a hell of a jump.The player might not be interested in Syracuse.
I am going to give the staff benefit of this doubt. They know we need another frontcourt big for next year.
Kentucky got Travis Reed from Stanford this year as a grad transfer.
They work.
Our team needs a 4/5 who can score inside.
This player may want to go Kentucky.
they work for a program like kentucky whose culture is built upon self-interested one-and-done playersKentucky got Travis Reed from Stanford this year as a grad transfer.
They work.