Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NYCCuse826, post: 4660310, member: 8866"] The intent was to allow for student athletes to do autograph signings, receive sponsorships and sell merchandise bearing their name, image or likeness in exchange for compensation. Because the NCAA doesn't have any foresight, they left it up to interpretation and as a result, boosters exploited the NIL rule. While the intent was fair, we're in uncharted wilderness because of Mark Emmett and the rest of the NCAA. There are few instances of NIL being done within the spirit of the rule. It's become a free for all with players with no marketability getting paid like they were employees of the school by overzealous boosters. [/QUOTE]