Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Dino-saur, post: 3066544, member: 7343"]
I am not saying the class is a failure because we aren’t getting all 4/5 star players nor am I singling out missing on priority targets. Both are completely understandable. Just want to constructively talk about filling positional needs. Also wasn’t comparing us to UGa by any means just responding to a comment that was saying they recruit RB every year even though they have good ones and that is an applicable concept to our backfield and defensive backfield.

Does anyone want to talk constructively about positional analysis in this class now?

I’m not saying any player isn’t good or isn’t good enough. Just wondering about what positions we should be focusing on from a macro perspective. Any caliber player can pan out, but if your system needs big, long corners or taller outside WRs, etc then you should recruit to those needs as well as backfilling positions of strength.

At a macro positional level someone please constructively respond with what in the class you think we’ve accomplished and not accomplished to this extent. Not just missing out on Gowdy or certain priority recruits, but filling positions groups specifically opposed to just where we sit in the cumulative recruiting ranking that we all agree is sometimes meaningless or at least can be somewhat overcome.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?