Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RF2044, post: 1191748, member: 40"] Sounds to me like inferred vs. implied confusion. I don't recall a single post claiming that the #1 goal was what you write above. But I have seen a lot of knowledgeable posters--including both coaches and former players--who have debunked the notion that overplaying Cooney wasn't a concerted focal point of opposing defenses. Suggesting otherwise is completely false. So... if people want to fall back on subjectively interpreting "overplay" to mean that it was the other team's #1 goal and that it requries constant double teaming instead of what was actually being implied, then I can understand why many seem to be confused. But this highlights for me that the posters who don't have a grasp of foundational defensive concepts or don't recognize what the other team is doing defensively away from the ball really ought to stop arguing about X's and O's. [/QUOTE]