DoctorBombay
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 9,776
- Like
- 27,546
Sensitive I see? Who cares? It's a message board and a valid question, IMO. Actually, an App St or JMU rarely beat a superior team. Those are fluke occurences and Boise St. has been a superior team the past five years. I don't know what Boise's recruiting rankings have been as of late but their coaching is tremendous and they do have good players. Why can't Syracuse become an east coast version of Boise? I hope it can. We have very good coaching.
I'm not convinced that SC does. I mean what has Kiffin really done as a head football coach? Look, I'm an SC alum who grew up in Oswego so this game is a win-win either way. SC will probably overlook SU and play sloppy football. Marrone and Co. will come up with a good gameplan and if the players execute they can keep it close if SC is sleepwalking. That Barkley-Woods combo is probably strong enough to bail them out if SC comes out and plays sloppy. Hopefully it's a close game and I think there is a better than average chance that it can be.
As WBoro himself clarified, his intent was not to denigrate SU & he regrets if it was taken that way. Seeing his clarification, it puts the issue in proper context- but its certainly understandable why folks interpreted it the wrong way.
BTW- it was never about the "validity" of the OP- it IS a message board, thats what we're all here for...to express our POV.
No need to be so literal either, the point was that "on paper" those teams (Boise, JMU, App State) have been & are usually considered underdogs to AQ's- so a win is often seen as an upset. Boise's emergence to being legit was gradual- 4 years ago the "conventional wisdom" had them losing to OU in the Fiesta Bowl based on, wait for it..... supposedly "superior talent & recruiting". Sound familiar?