Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 5430344, member: 622"]
No to mess with you directly, just using your post to get this in:

If any player does not choose to attend school, there should be no scholarship.  As the football and men's basketball teams are generally the only positive cash flow teams (we can ignore outliers for the simplification of the discussion), if these teams are no longer counted for scholarships, the women's side could potentially lose 115-120 scholarships, the men's side could be required to increase non-revenue teams, or a mix of both.  Things will get ugly.

Title IX requires a balance between the male and female scholarships.  Does it go the way of the dodo?  Does it get enforced?  How will it be enforced?

How does Title IX affect the decisions?  How do the conferences deem which teams are counted for minimums?  How does the NCAA deem which teams are counted for minimums?  If no football and no hoops players are on scholarship, why should the team count for minimums?  What happens with teams whose stars don't attend classes but the bulk of the team is on scholarship?

This is a world class can of worms.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?