nice little rumor going on
There are going to be some good jobs open.
Texas, USC, Uconn, my guess Wake and UVA as well. I could see Mullen being in trouble at MSU. Holgerson could be in trouble.
Dabo is an Alabama alum I doubt he goes to Texas. I think the next Longhorns coach will be Peterson from Boise State, Will Muschamp from Florida(to get away from Florida before the heat starts for him), Kevin Sumlin from Texas A&M or the longest of long shots Nick Saban.
Holgorsen always seems to do just enough to not be on the hot seat. It will be interesting to see how long WVU puts up with mediocrity.There are going to be some good jobs open.
Texas, USC, Uconn, my guess Wake and UVA as well. I could see Mullen being in trouble at MSU. Holgerson could be in trouble.
I think Dabo deserves a ton of credit for what he has done there, no matter his seeming goofiness. He's basically Les Miles without the national title, so therefore he doesn't get much of a pass.
That said, I bet down deep a lot of Clemson folks would rather lose Dabo and promote Chad Morris than to lose Morris at the end of this year.
Alabama is only place he'd go...and that's only happening if we win the NC this year. I'll take his goofiness...better than the troll on the FSU sideline, lol.
Alabama is only place he'd go...and that's only happening if we win the NC this year. I'll take his goofiness...better than the troll on the FSU sideline, lol.
There are going to be some good jobs open.
Texas, USC, Uconn, my guess Wake and UVA as well. I could see Mullen being in trouble at MSU. Holgerson could be in trouble.
London won't be gone immediately, he recruits too well.
Crazy talk. I like London, but if he doesn't go bowling, UVA needs to replace him if they are at all serious about football. Have to do something with that talent, and they aren't showing enough progress.
Unless UVA is content being one of the worst in the conference.
I don't actually think it's totally fair because of the way they schedule, they make it tougher there than need be. But if they are serious about not being passed by Pitt, BC, Syracuse, NCSU, and even Duke, London should be feeling some pressure.
I hate to feel this way, because I don't as a person, but as a football fan the ACC schools have traditionally held on to coaches at least a year or two too long. The SEC has let guys go a year or so too early sometimes.
As a human, I want guys to get an extra chance...but the bottom line is in the last 20 years, there just hasn't been many examples of guys given that extra time that made it worth it. Just drives the program further down. You probably need to go back to Frank Beamer at VT to find a guy where patience was rewarded in this conference. Everything else has been just forestalling the inevitable and making the situation worse.
Unfortunately in the same time period in the SEC, there are countless firings that you could easily characterise as being two early or a guy not getting a fair chance. And in all cases except Tennessee (post Fulmer) the team has benefited from the removal and equalled or reached new heights.
It's a sad and unfortunate truth...but in college football it bears out that if the guy isn't clearly the right guy after 2-3 years...he's almost certainly not the right guy.
Sumlin would be interesting because that could set off a particular chain of events, including Larry Fedora leaving UNC for aTm (he's from College Station).
I agree he needs a bowl but 5 wins may keep him another year just because he already has verbals from two of the top 10 overall recruits in the ESPN 150. Who would UVA hire?Crazy talk. I like London, but if he doesn't go bowling, UVA needs to replace him if they are at all serious about football. Have to do something with that talent, and they aren't showing enough progress.
Unless UVA is content being one of the worst in the conference.
I don't actually think it's totally fair because of the way they schedule, they make it tougher there than need be. But if they are serious about not being passed by Pitt, BC, Syracuse, NCSU, and even Duke, London should be feeling some pressure.
I hate to feel this way, because I don't as a person, but as a football fan the ACC schools have traditionally held on to coaches at least a year or two too long. The SEC has let guys go a year or so too early sometimes.
As a human, I want guys to get an extra chance...but the bottom line is in the last 20 years, there just hasn't been many examples of guys given that extra time that made it worth it. Just drives the program further down. You probably need to go back to Frank Beamer at VT to find a guy where patience was rewarded in this conference. Everything else has been just forestalling the inevitable and making the situation worse.
Unfortunately in the same time period in the SEC, there are countless firings that you could easily characterise as being two early or a guy not getting a fair chance. And in all cases except Tennessee (post Fulmer) the team has benefited from the removal and equalled or reached new heights.
It's a sad and unfortunate truth...but in college football it bears out that if the guy isn't clearly the right guy after 2-3 years...he's almost certainly not the right guy.
There are going to be some good jobs open.
Texas, USC, Uconn, my guess Wake and UVA as well. I could see Mullen being in trouble at MSU. Holgerson could be in trouble.
Its because Mullen has beaten nobody in 4 years and Ole Miss has recruited well and passed them by. I don't agree with it just because Alabama, LSU, and now Texas A&M with Ole Miss, Auburn, Arkansas all better at recruiting Mississippi State is looking at 7th place finishes. Mullen needs a signature win and he doesn't have one thus he is on the hot seat.It seems ridiculous that Mullen could be in trouble given his recent success. I guess losing to Auburn hurts and he is kind of on a losing streak. They are still recovering from the Sylvester Croom era. He had them ranked in his first few years and has had a bunch of 7 and 8 win seasons. Maybe in the SEC if you stumble at all it means you are under pressure. That feels really unfair to me. Not like Miss State is a perennial powerhouse.
From his official bio...Its because Mullen has beaten nobody in 4 years and Ole Miss has recruited well and passed them by. I don't agree with it just because Alabama, LSU, and now Texas A&M with Ole Miss, Auburn, Arkansas all better at recruiting Mississippi State is looking at 7th place finishes. Mullen needs a signature win and he doesn't have one thus he is on the hot seat.