OrangeDW
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2012
- Messages
- 65,353
- Like
- 200,303
I'm with you. I'm just saying generally it's hard to believe we are better than clemson on the DL. They have recruited and developed so well there and been so dominant -- not just on a 'really good team' level but on a 'we're going to go beat alabama on the biggest stage of all' level -- and we've just been so far from that kind of talent for so long that I just struggle to believe it. It's just sort of the way, for lack of a better word, of college sports. Duke loses three lottery picks in college hoops but it's hard to feel like you're going to be 'better' than they are in the frontcourt or whatever ... even if you had some really solid kids coming back.
Having said that, I love our DL and if Clemson doesn't quite replace all those guys seamlessly I could see it make some sense.
Agree for the most part on Tommy too. Third-year player is huge, the system itself will help him and he's going to be surrounded by better players than Dungey ever was. So it feels like everything is in place. Just saying his overall numbers (50% completions, 4 TDs, 3 INTs, 6.0 yds/att) and even his numbers in one of the wins (11-16, 144 yds, 1 TD vs. FSU) weren't exactly eye-popping. Not knocking the kid, just saying I'm not 100% sure that he's a top QB in the ACC yet.
Again, I acknowledge I could be completely wrong.
Couple things on Tommy’s numbers...those FSU numbers were not in a full game. I forget when Eric went out, but I think it was the second quarter. I believe we were only up 7-6. We ran away with that game with Tommy in. We didn’t need him to air it out and take chances in that one. He just needed to be steady and mistake free, because FSU was going to collapse.
And I think his overall numbers are skewed because the game where he got to play the most was the ND game - he had very little chance there. I don’t think Eric’s passing numbers would’ve been pretty in that one either. His legs were our only shot(and that was a small one too).