Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Cusefan95, post: 4982824, member: 173"]
Care to defend that claim?  Do you have anything more substantive than a couple trustees secretly lobbying for the field to be named for Paterno (and publicly proposing it, then immediately pulling it so no debate can occur)?

There's a reason why virtually no Penn State fans give a crap about your opinion (or people like you) - its because your opinion is devoid of any factual basis, it is entirely driven by your emotions.  Since its entirely emotional and not rational or factual, there is no way for it to be factually disproven - the best course of action for Penn State fans is to recognize that and ignore the nonsense.

While what Paterno did was legally adequate - it was not morally adequate.  I don't think even Joe Paterno would dispute that.  The field isn't ever going to be named for him because the debate - if it were to ever occur - would be about the wisdom of naming a field for someone with such a public and significant moral failing on his record.  That's not a debate that supporters of Joe Paterno can win in a public debate in Pennsylvania (in spite of what you appear to be indicating you believe)- and that is why they were discussing this in secret and pulled the proposal before any debate when they were forced by the media to bring it up at a board meeting.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?