Orangeyes
R.I.P Dan
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 16,265
- Like
- 21,713
There are 2 real issues with BYU in a conference: they oppose conference mates selling beer in stadiums and they refuse to play any games on Sunday.BYU has had too much success and has too much of a pedigree to be left out. On the other hand from what I've heard they are a monster to deal with when you have them in a conference.
They oppose selling beer????? To heck with them!!!There are 2 real issues with BYU in a conference: they oppose conference mates selling beer in stadiums and they refuse to play any games on Sunday.
The first, everyone can ignore. The second causes major issues in all sports but football.
If BYU wants in, it must have its Prophet hear a new revelation from God that playing on Sunday is OK, as long as all Mormon players and coaches attend church on that day.
That should prove less harmful to the Mormon faithful than the Prophet hearing God say that polygamy must end, conveniently after the US made it clear that Utah could not be a state until the Mormons reversed Joseph Smith's voice from God ordering him and them to be polygamous.
I second this movement!They oppose selling beer????? To heck with them!!!
Well, this isn't accurate at all.If BYU wants in, it must have its Prophet hear a new revelation from God that playing on Sunday is OK, as long as all Mormon players and coaches attend church on that day.
Well, this isn't accurate at all.
I'm not sure I'd argue about that. I was pointing out the inaccuracy of Woad's comment that BYU changing conferences would require a revelation to the Prophet.Mormons do not bend. Period. This makes them very good business people and works well when they are functioning on their home turf in parts of the west and enclaves around the country. But when you take that into a dynamic of give and take where as an institution you don't have the most chips on the table - and it doesn't work well at all.
The Big 12 Contract is set. They get no more money by adding any teams (If I recall, they get a proportional increase so the new team would get the same share, but the teams will not receive an increase). There is no incentive to expand. Texas and Oklahoma are in the drivers seats and can wait for a sweetheart deal. Unless there is major population growth in the plains states or they invite profitable teams in large markets, their conference is doomed to lag behind the others in TV deals.
For the Big Texas it is all about the money. Of course they will sell the fact that everyone gets to play everyone and that is a great factor. But, when that conference flat lined with the defections, and a TV deal was brokered that kept each teams earnings the same, their fate was sealed. There is no one short of ND that would increase the value enough to allow for a new deal. They are already getting paid for a 12 team league with only ten members. If they expand, the TV deal will not pay more; therefore, the slice is less per team regardless of tier 3 rights. Basically, the Big Texas better hope that the playoff system doesn't change to include conference champions. That is why they latched onto the ACC proposal for no divisions and a conference having more say in how its champion is decided.
The Big 12 Contract is set. They get no more money by adding any teams (If I recall, they get a proportional increase so the new team would get the same share, but the teams will not receive an increase). There is no incentive to expand until Oklahoma's impending departure to the Big Ten happens.
Fixed.