Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Development in and Around Syracuse Discussion
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="OttoMets, post: 2917028, member: 716"] I agree with some of this. A grid won't be a panacea, cheaper for cheaper's sake is idiotic, and lawsuits are coming. For motorists whose drive could get longer: this is an interesting question. Should it matter? I'm not offering an answer to that question, but it's worth discussing. To what extent should a billion-dollar transportation project be shaped by the prospect of X number of drivers facing an increase in miles traveled by Y with an added time delay of Z? To what extent should those who are saving miles and time cancel that out? And how does the economic activity/property value situation outweigh both of those considerations? Regarding cheaper being better - I think this is a cynical (or politically expedient) ploy to appeal to a certain type of voter/politician who views everything in life through the prism of dollars and cents. I don't love it, but in this instance, I'm not complaining if it's effective. And, as you say, cheaper [U]can[/U] be the better option, but not necessarily for that reason. (For a number of reasons, I think it is in this instance.) University Hill vs. the South Side...this is like the "barrier" characterization. Those who don't have first-hand experience with the area don't seem to understand the relationship, and there's no getting around that. I'll just say that this is a place-making opportunity. Right now, the corridor is an ugly, inhospitable place suffering from disinvestment. That stands in contrast to adjacent neighborhoods and hinders their growth. Tunnel or expanded viaducts will, based on everything we know, fail to improve this situation or even worsen it. Reliance on the existing grid comes with none of those problems. The one externality associated with a grid is increased driving times for some motorists in some areas. An micro-level inconvenience in many ways? Sure. The basis for ignoring decades of good policy outcomes elsewhere, eh, I'm not convinced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Development in and Around Syracuse Discussion
Top
Bottom