Likewise.
Oh, I'm sorry, let me try to do better.
Your complaint that I alter my opinions depending upon the situation is I think untrue.
In fact, most on this board would agree - as you apparently agree - that I consistently argue that when it comes to winning college football games, the key determining factor is talent - more so than coaching. Many disagree with that idea - I guess you're one of them - but most would agree that that is how I see things.
In fact, your original post - the cheap shot with the poor grammar - takes that position - that I can be relied upon to argue that
talent is normally the determining factor.
In response to my observation about the 2012 Pitt squad - that the team is playing with eight new starters on defense, thereby
explaining from a talent standpoint why the Panthers are having trouble defending right now - your offer up the curious allegation that my "narratives change frequently to suit whatever point" I am trying to make. And, my reference to Wannstedt was not made in terms of his coaching ability on the field. It referred to his ability to recruit western PA. During his time at Pitt he recruited very well - he gathered a lot of talent. He was never able to recruit a QB and that's why though he won a lot of games he was never able to get over the hump. The mistake was in firing him because he was accumulating a lot of talent - it was only a matter of time before he finally got a QB. The changing of coaches - three in three years - has hurt recruiting and has alienated the western PA coaches. And that has impacted Pitt's talent level from what I can gather.
So, it seems fairly clear that your second post is contrary to your "cheap shot post."
And, it seems that you really didn't have anything of substance to offer, but just wanted to throw a cheap shot.
Hopefully that clarifies things for you. Keep plugging.
