Trueblue25
Cali Award Magistrate; 2023 Cali Award Rushing Yds
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2013
- Messages
- 40,593
- Like
- 83,216
Whats the difference?Is that your opinion or fact? (lol)
Whats the difference?Is that your opinion or fact? (lol)
I think the implication is that it is very convenient that the witness has recanted, so someone intervened somehow.So the victims states that this young man didn’t have a firearm and didn’t shoot him and yet we still think he’s guilty?
Just want to make sure I am understanding this correctly
I think the implication is that it is very convenient that the witness has recanted, so someone intervened somehow.
Happens all the time. Some of the naivete here is so cute.I think the implication is that it is very convenient that the witness has recanted, so someone intervened somehow.
Happens all the time. Some of the naivete here is so cute.
As I said before we have too many want to be judges on this board.Assuming to know what happened one way or another is note cute.
To have an opinion on how you feel about said player in a position like this is understandable. I would assume Coach has a better understanding of the situation from the kid and his parents as well as high school coach and I would imagine the school.
To have a bit of a past doesn't always determine your future. Good luck to the kid either way.
Maybe but we have also too many people who will twist themselves into a pretzel to justify taking a very talented player. You are correct that we don’t know the exact circumstances but it is fair to say both that and the rationalization part tooAs I said before we have too many want to be judges on this board.
None of us were there or know any of the people involved.
Taking the player is up to the University, and the coaching staff, and whatever they decide is fine with me.Maybe but we have also too many people who will twist themselves into a pretzel to justify taking a very talented player. You are correct that we don’t know the exact circumstances but it is fair to say both that and the rationalization part too
Yeah I am not going to make a moral judgement in this case if that happens but I do have concerns for both student/teammate safety and team chemistry(in that order) even if they do.Taking the player is up to the University, and the coaching staff, and whatever they decide is fine with me.
The truth is probably somewhere in the middle.Is it???? Because the “witness” was the victim
Isn’t it possible that the victim just had bad blood at that time with this young man and lied about it?
And they usually stink!Bottom line is Opinions are like a$$holes everybody has one.
Guys like what? I think the point is we don't know the circumstances or the kid. Maybe you're right, he's a bad kid with a bad attitude and a violent temper. I don't know and I have no evidence to say otherwise. Maybe he was a dumb kid who learned not to be around bad people and has truly grown. I don't know, no evidence against that either. What I DO have is people I trust who do know these things who are near to the kid. So until Fran, Nick and the rest of the staff prove that my faith in them is misguided, I'll roll with whatever they decide.The truth is probably somewhere in the middle.
That being said, if Fran is building a program where character is one of his most important pieces, you don't recruit guys like this.
One other thought that makes me trust Fran in this spot. I would be very surprised and confused if the same coach that kicked a very talented DL off campus with a nice "Adios" for being rude to staff would then also allow what he felt to be a potentially explosive powder keg and locker room cancer of a talented DL on the team just weeks later.
If he keeps his head straight and performs, he may very well get a portal shot down the road. Teams always need quality DL.Committed to UAB today. He has all American potential.