2-0
Have a nice life.This is wearing thin now.
Yes, we are 2-0 but that shouldn't end discussion.
Keep posting it if you feel you must, but I just wanted to let you know as one of the more "rah, rah" types on this board my thoughts on seeing this now in every thread.
Cheers,
Neil
He said he was holding back because he wants to limit Dungey's mistakes. I don't love it. We need to spread it around now so that when we get to the better teams we have some experience there.
A really, really stupid reply.2-0
This. Lester feeds Dungey a bit more next week and by LSU opens the whole can of ammunition.I am just hoping it was because this was ED's first P5 game. But the real test of that theory will probably be LSU a game where I hope they pull out every trick in the book to try and win.
Cheers,
Neil
if not, the limited attempts in the air, and esp the targets of Ish, could be troublesome
qdawgg said:Do I think knowing how important this game was to get to a bowl, with the potential to lose the game based on the performance at the half... did we limit the playbook so people don't know what we are going to do??????? I'm baffled at times by things people post.
orangenauburn said:The rest of college football 'opens it up' We close it up and go conservative
Watching it on the TV, I would add that Wake's D was far more disciplined, too. Such as forcing runs to the outside more than up the gut (at least until our line wore them out).No. The size and speed of the game today was much different than last week. I felt the first halve we were letting Dungey get his feet wet and get a feel for that size and speed and probably better schemes. He made a couple bad passes that first half too. Second half? We opened it up more obviously as Dungey got more comfortable. We kept it close on the scoreboard that first half which allowed us to ease Dungey into the flow.
if not, the limited attempts in the air, and esp the targets of Ish, could be troublesome
He said he was holding back because he wants to limit Dungey's mistakes. I don't love it. We need to spread it around now so that when we get to the better teams we have some experience there.
No. He limited it for Dungey.
rrlbees said:No. The size and speed of the game today was much different than last week. I felt the first halve we were letting Dungey get his feet wet and get a feel for that size and speed and probably better schemes. He made a couple bad passes that first half too. Second half? We opened it up more obviously as Dungey got more comfortable. We kept it close on the scoreboard that first half which allowed us to ease Dungey into the flow.
if not, the limited attempts in the air, and esp the targets of Ish, could be troublesome