Total bs.I thought they said they would review it but then it was never shown. I was sure it would be changed to a 2 .
Clearly toes were on the line and it was said they would review it. No mention of review after the timeout. It could have been the difference.
It's on right now. TerribleAnybod check it on the DVR? Honestly that should make it to the NCAA.. no joke.
based on the camera angles on the endline they used to show the cuse bench at times they should have had the closeup view and been able to make the call no problem.I took the time to go back and look on DVR. My girlfriend and I were sure he was well inside the line but upon review it was much closer than we had thought. His left foot was behind and his right foot appeared to be on the line. Only trouble is that they would have needed a closer view to tell definitively whether he was on the line. If they didn't have a different view aside from the traditional broadcast view it would have been difficult to overturn.
I took the time to go back and look on DVR. My girlfriend and I were sure he was well inside the line but upon review it was much closer than we had thought. His left foot was behind and his right foot appeared to be on the line. Only trouble is that they would have needed a closer view to tell definitively whether he was on the line. If they didn't have a different view aside from the traditional broadcast view it would have been difficult to overturn.
It was clear as day, and if it was reviewed why didn't o'brien at least say it was reviewed? I'd have no problem if they said "no clear evidence play stands". They could have easily zoomed in and saw what most everybody saw.interesting. I thought the right foot was on the line to the point his toe was inside it. that said it does come down to the camera angle.. would think they could zoom as well..
That broadcast last night was just amateur hour at times
It might have been worse than the reffing. Toss up.That broadcast last night was just amateur hour at times
It was clear as day, and if it was reviewed why didn't o'brien at least say it was reviewed? I'd have no problem if they said "no clear evidence play stands". They could have easily zoomed in and saw what most everybody saw.
Broadcast duo claimed the shot would be reviewed at the next TV timeout. I don't recall them following up on it, though.
You know what's even funnier the headlines that will be after the . Florida Uk game. It will be either "Florida becoming best team in the country" or " Kentucky finally turning the corner". That games going to suck, can't root for either.ESPN as a whole is just unbelievable with how giddy they seem to be with the thought of us losing and equally giddy over wichita st not losing. Its getting old watching them find new ways to doubt us and claim how we are going to lose here or there etc or they go back to the legal block at duke.
You know what's even funnier the headlines that will be after the . Florida Uk game. It will be either "Florida becoming best team in the country" or " Kentucky finally turning the corner". That games going to suck, can't root for either.
I would love to play them!Florida is a good team. Yet they aren't the top team in the country. Put them in a bracket thats not busted and boom.. adios gators. The SEC is weak sauce. Really only 2 teams and then the drop off is monumental.