Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Crusty, post: 1528015, member: 2265"] I guess you don't see the inconsistency of your argument. You are willing to have the state pay for a chunk of concrete that goes into infrastructure, but not a chunk of concrete that goes into the dome itself. Same beneficiaries but somehow different to you. More importantly, the university is the greatest economic driver in the region and the state is justified in supporting it in every way that is can. An investment in a new dome makes more sense than an outdoor performance center and yet nobody bitches about it. Besides, the area near the dome can be developed as well , probably by the university itself. Once again, Mayor Miner blew it and the state and SU went to plan B, which will be fabulous. [/QUOTE]