Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="xc84, post: 1661382, member: 1526"] No one is playing any corporate stonewalling games. SU needed money. Carrier gave it in exchange for naming the Building the Carrier Dome. Both parties were happy with the arrangement. SU has looked into legal options. There are none that make sense for both parties. And it's not just signage. The name "Carrier Dome" is used by broadcasters over and over before and during an event. News outlets use it. People talk about it. etc. It's a very valuable asset that Carrier will protect until they get a worthwhile offer. [/QUOTE]