Is it me, or are people missing the real story here? You don't replace the roof with a permanent structure unless you have to. Which makes me think the dome is going to expand out...and lose its ability to operate the ventilation systems that support the roof. Sounds like that rumored west side expansion project.
This would also mean no new stadium on or off campus.
Is this a 3-4 month project, or will we be playing football on J-D's new turf field for a season?
if Syracuse plays at schoelkopf, then yes...zak was right, they should just drop to 1aa.Just a novice's guess: I would think first order would be to build the support structures and any additions to the Dome on the west side while maintaining air pressure. I would imagine the Dome would build the roof starting in late Feb/early March to early/mid September late in the project. Lacrosse games would have to play at an alternate location. A backup plan would have Football games in Ithaca/MetLife if their were delays with the roof into the Fall. I could see this project going on for 18-24 months. The train would have to come back and be part of the parking plan.
if Syracuse plays at schoelkopf, then yes...zak was right, they should just drop to 1aa.
i know they played one there in 79, but that was different. to do so now would be a disaster.
Giants Stadium, Rich Stadium or even Yankee Stadium should be the only choices.
looks like theres some good smoke around a new Dome Bonnet.
this should make everyone happy.
That extra $25-40M could be put to better use.My thought is no. The main cost of retro-fitting the dome is adding the supports needed for a non-air-supported roof. That will be in the hundreds of millions. In the case of Minnesota, they are building a structure that can hold such a roof. For our dome, they would have to add support for a non-air-supported roof too...whether it is retractable or not. So, I think the part about the additional costs of making a roof retractable v. not are applicable to our discussion of the Carrier Dome. I don't see why there would be extra support needed for a
retractable roof v. non-retractable and I think the Minnesota dome bears that out. They say could make it retractable for $25M to $40M more. I don't think that requires extra support above and beyond what is needed for a fixed roof... but if it does, then the assessment is still the same... it's an extra $25M to $40M (using this article as a reference) to go from non-retractable design to retractable.
I understand that position and it will probably be the one that actually comes to fruition.That extra $25-40M could be put to better use.
yeah, the 1aa i suppose could sneak in there.As long as schoelkopf doesn't exceed the season ticket totals...we could survive playing our 1AA OOC game there and maybe another one like a Tulane. I agree the other games will have to go to larger facilities.
Use orange-tinted translucent panels. Fixed!
A backup plan would have Football games in Ithaca/MetLife if their were delays with the roof into the Fall. I could see this project going on for 18-24 months. The train would have to come back and be part of the parking plan.
That extra $25-40M could be put to better use.
People, anyone worth their salt in planning stadium renovations can figure out how to simultaneously use a facility while doing said renovations.
MSG was open nearly constantly for a couple years while improvements were made. Fenway Park was in a constant state of renovation for a decade and they never had to play a ball game at BC.
Please, just stop with that stuff.
The Silverdome played its first game with the roof half-finished and not even inflated.
we are moving them to modify entitled attitudes.We aren't moving games to modify the Dome.
So the state of that place now is "retro" is what you're saying?
actually, the Garden was shut from at least June-Oct during all 3 phases. your soon to be EC Champions opened with a nifty 10 game road trip this year. fenway is open air and stayed open air, the renovations were basically done on the outside coming in.People, anyone worth their salt in planning stadium renovations can figure out how to simultaneously use a facility while doing said renovations.
MSG was open nearly constantly for a couple years while improvements were made. Fenway Park was in a constant state of renovation for a decade and they never had to play a ball game at BC.
Please, just stop with that stuff.
So the state of that place now is "retro" is what you're saying?