Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Don McPherson points the finger of blame for 0-5 finish
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 334235, member: 289"] The quote by McPherson was in response to my question. Here is the full question and response for context: Q: In 1986, following a bowl season, the Orange started out 0-4, beart a bad Missouri team and then got crushed by Penn State. From that point, SU won four of it's last five games and then went 11-0-1 in 1987. Last year, following a bowl season, the Orange started 5-2, blowing out West Virginia along the way, and then SU went 0-5. How does that happen? How do apparently bad teams get good and apparently good teams go bad? A: I think what happens is chemistry. I think the first half of the season is coaches setting the tone; the second half of the season is the player setting the tone because they start to control the locker room. The starting unit spends more time together. they learn how to communicate better. When you look at the teams that get better during the year, it's because you have good personnel that communicates well. Coach Mac said years ago that when you're a young coach, you think it's 80% coaching and 20% players. Then you get a little bit more mature and you think it's a 50-50 thing. Then, when you get older and you really know what you're doing, you realize it's 90% players and 10% coaching. And it's true. When you do your job well as a coach and the players buy into what you're talking about, they start to set the tone. With the Syracuse team last year, there were some disruptions in the coaching staff and personnel. Sometimes you can make that one wrong move in one of those areas and you can lose the team. And I think that's what happened with SU. I don't know what it was internally but I believe last eyar's team stopped communicating with each other. it was very evident in the games I covered for SNY that you didn't see that positve non-verbal communciaiton happening. You saw a lot of hands in the air after players, which meant they weren't communicaitng during plays." His reference to coaching changes would have to be for coaching changes before last season, not since. But he's basically putting the blame on the players for poor chemistry and not communciating. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Don McPherson points the finger of blame for 0-5 finish
Top
Bottom