Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="ssbriefcase, post: 1037363, member: 883"]
First of all, you're assuming a hell of a lot.  What's at play right now, is his own voice on a recording.  He said she said is a reach, and certainly nothing in comparison with this.  And it's already being discussed on why something wasn't done sooner when it was out there before, which when this was addressed in an earlier post, I asked how does that lessen what's on the table now?  Do you think him saying, "so and so did this too" is going to help?  Or deflect?  Will people believe him after he's caught in the act?  Like a jailhouse snitch trying to get their sentence reduced.  No credibility.  Not without a recording it won't.  Not even close.  And you're talking about him producing a hell of a lot of proof.

You're really comparing players saying something like this to an owner saying it??  Wow.  The owner has control and power over people and his employees.  A player has nothing on that.  And since you're dealing with a lot of if's and buts.  How about the possibility of civil rights abuse?  They certainly could have a case.  There's nothing more serious than that imo.  And it doesn't matter if he's the only owner that said something like this.  What's that got to do with him on tape and the public hearing HIM?
   And I said in my last post about if they need to do some more things to tighten up ownership other than racism so be it.  But can we just start with if there was one thing out there to revoke ownership it should be racism and blatant at that? And saying it about ex players and players that he's an employer of?  Dam if that's not a reason then I don't know of one..
And if the league wants to continue it's popularity, it would be to do the exact opposite of what you suggest, and that's to deal with it as they get it, not sweep it under the rug.  But this is first and foremost.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?