We’ve been down this path. Autry makes well under the average ACC coach. Likely near the bottom. So maybe we’re just getting what we paid for. And don’t give me the usual well this midmajor or that midmajor coach is doing more for less.
Which part ha. It’s been reported the chancellor is stepping down.
Correct. No chancellor hired here is going to willfully torpedo any chance we have at being good at athletics. It’s part of the job.
Well i think that was pretty obvious watching it
According to the link below, he's not all that far off from ACC coaches, some coaches paid around him are doing far better than him (perhaps he is over paid). He is probably making over $2M in base (was 1.8M for 10Months in 2023 according to the board) so thats around Pat Kesely, Hamilton, Scheyer, and Sanchez. I wouldnt exactly say he is underpaid and there are people who have had significant success around him.
Syverud is going to be 70 next October. Does the school already have a shortlist of candidates to replace him? Is it just the BOT or will the faculty and students also have seats at the table.
Ooph if you didn’t even time to click the link next to Scheyers name. He’s not the 66th paid coach in the ncaa. That was the # he was “partially” paid in 2022. Come on guy. Be better.According to the link below, he's not all that far off from ACC coaches, some coaches paid around him are doing far better than him (perhaps he is over paid). He is probably making over $2M in base (was 1.8M for 10Months in 2023 according to the board) so thats around Pat Kesely, Hamilton, Scheyer, and Sanchez. I wouldnt exactly say he is underpaid and there are people who have had significant success around him.
In short, money isnt the issue.
Men's Basketball Head Coach Salaries - USA TODAY
Ever wondered who the highest paid coach in men's basketball is? Find out today with USA TODAY's complete salary data.sportsdata.usatoday.com
But, money is potentially an issue, especially for names that 3/4 of this forum wants. Cuse needs to put a package together that makes it compelling for someone to come coach here. The name alone is not good enough.According to the link below, he's not all that far off from ACC coaches, some coaches paid around him are doing far better than him (perhaps he is over paid). He is probably making over $2M in base (was 1.8M for 10Months in 2023 according to the board) so thats around Pat Kesely, Hamilton, Scheyer, and Sanchez. I wouldnt exactly say he is underpaid and there are people who have had significant success around him.
In short, money isnt the issue.
Men's Basketball Head Coach Salaries - USA TODAY
Ever wondered who the highest paid coach in men's basketball is? Find out today with USA TODAY's complete salary data.sportsdata.usatoday.com
If it happens it will be a proven winner at the MM level that 75% of the forum will complain about because it isn't Nate Oats, Jay Wright or Gmac. Just like Louisville hired.
The midmajor coach is doing more for less. I would take any a10 coach over Red. We took a shot with an IN HOUSE asst and it did not work out. Not like we went and got some up and coming asst everyone wanted. You wouldn’t take Anthony Grant over Red Autry? Dayton has their least talented roster in forever this yr and they beat Georgetown, won at Marquette and took BYU to the last minute. Every VCU hire seems to work out. These guys actually coach. Red has shown he is a pretty good recruiter, I won’t take that from him. But coaching, he has to be at the bottom tier of division 1. Clapping during m2m defense isn’t coaching.
bc "fmily values", "keeping up appearances", etc being "fair"
So that’s one difference? What’s the excuse for everyone else?
I mean sure then weather is potentially an issue, the dome is potentially an issue, the color of the jerseys is potentially an issue. At the end of the day there are good coaches making the same to a relatively small amount more in terms of salary and performing. Syracuse is not the little sisters of the poor.
Agree. That's one of my frustrations as well. We need a PG that can score, especially in crunch time, and can hit the big shots. Houston game perfect example. He needed to take that shot!
We are kind of saying the same thing. Why would a coach making the same amount of money come here. There has to be a compelling reason. Obviously, a mid major who would get a big bump and a big stage, that makes sense. But does a successful mid major guarantee success at a power conference. Don't know, but I have a feeling we will find out.
what draws coaches anywhere? Why would someone want to go to Gonzaga, or Virginia, or Villanova. many times it is, is the job available?
I know Willard is getting 4mil at Nova. No reason we can’t match that for our next HC.
I hear you and I agree. Go argue it out in the other thread with people that want to pay for a real proven coach with P5 experience.
