So,, how are we judging 'talent'? Ability to hit an uncontested shot? Jumping height? Wingspan? Speed? It's one of those things pundits say and then never really have to back up, because they assume we know what they mean, and we assume we know that they mean.
'Talent' at what? Basketball. Your team has talent but a subpar record/resume? So what do you blame that on, coaching? So, if UK/UNC have the most talent ever year but fail to win the NCAA championship, why aren't Calipari and Roy considered the worst coaches in the world?