Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CusefanATL, post: 2169172, member: 853"] 1. Not really. The defense was pointing the finger at Hernandez's friend who was with him regarding the spilled drink. The spilled drink confrontation was agreed upon. He also stashed the car at his secret house for months. Therefore, he was not an innocent bystander. 2. someone needs to know the technicalities of the law that seemed to come as a surprise to most of the nation and the press. Maybe a FA who know that, im not sure - but i highly doubt AH knew the nuances of MA law on his own - which was the point. Not sure what your deal is with me, but you're being awfully nitpiky. [/QUOTE]