Seriously, you haven't followed along must be. Want me to repost any number of articles and quotes? You've obviously missed a lot.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Seriously, who cares if they are complaining. They aren't running the school. They aren't the ones that cut the deal with the NCAA.
The people in charge have agreed to sign off on substantial punishment without contesting the NCAA's authority to do so.
I don't believe in collective guilt, scorched earth, kill them all, treat it like Carthage. But that's just me. A closed circle of people made some horrible decisions. The institution is paying for it along with them. That's enough.
Emmett Otter? "Ain't no hole in the washtub!"I was just THRILLED to have an opportunity to post a pic of Emmett Otter!
From the article, a majority of the NCAA board of directors (minimum 10 out of 18) were ready to impose a 4-year death penalty. I continue to be amazed at how many people thought the NCAA wouldn't, couldn't, and/or shouldn't, make a strong move.Was going to be a 4 year death penalty.
From the article, a majority of the NCAA board of directors (minimum 10 out of 18) were ready to impose a 4-year death penalty. I continue to be amazed at how many people thought the NCAA wouldn't, couldn't, and/or shouldn't, make a strong move.
Exactly. Didn't need to be negotiated down. Emmert had the backing of the board.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Everything about how ****** up the Penn State football-centric culture is, in one tidy little sentence:
"Emmert and the NCAA are basically ruining this university. They are destroying the school."
Football penalties = destruction of the school.
Seriously, who cares if they are complaining. They aren't running the school. They aren't the ones that cut the deal with the NCAA.
The people in charge have agreed to sign off on substantial punishment without contesting the NCAA's authority to do so.
I don't believe in collective guilt, scorched earth, kill them all, treat it like Carthage. But that's just me. A closed circle of people made some horrible decisions. The institution is paying for it along with them. That's enough.
By the way, why is Sandusky never identified as a "homosexual" who preferred young boys? There were no young girls in any of this. I would think that "homosexual pedophile" is a more descriptive term. (Watch the fire this comment draws.)
GoSU96 - You'll not be able to reason with these people. Their blood is up because of the horrific nature of the crime.
By the way, why is Sandusky never identified as a "homosexual" who preferred young boys? There were no young girls in any of this. I would think that "homosexual pedophile" is a more descriptive term. (Watch the fire this comment draws.)
GoSU96 - You'll not be able to reason with these people. Their blood is up because of the horrific nature of the crime.
By the way, why is Sandusky never identified as a "homosexual" who preferred young boys? There were no young girls in any of this. I would think that "homosexual pedophile" is a more descriptive term. (Watch the fire this comment draws.)
Because the word pedophile does not differentiate.
As to reasoning with "these" people you nor GO can deny a single fact that has been posted by "these" people. In fact if I recall correctly, you were one of "those" people that has downplayed everything along the way, and been wrong, including saying the NCAA didn't have jurisdiction and thus would do nothing.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Homosexuality, heterosexuality and P e d o p h I l I aare three distinct sexualities. Homosexuals are adults who have same-sex attraction to other adults. Heterosexuals are adults who are sexually attracted to the opposite sex. Pedophiles are adults who are sexually attracted to prepubescent children or children in the early stages of puberty. The reason why Jerry Sandusky isn't referred to as a "homosexual pedophile" isn't to placate the gay community, it is because homosexual-pedophile and heterosexual-pedophile are not proper scientific terms.
Sounds like Political Correctness to me, not science.
Let me see if I have this straight. Homosexuals are attracted to the same sex ... like Jerry Sandusky.
Homosexuals perform sex acts --- I am told --- like the one that McQeery thinks he saw.
But because his partners or victims were underage, he's not a homosexual but a pedophile. In spite of the fact that no girls were ever involved.
And you buy this??"
Homosexuality, heterosexuality and P e d o p h I l I aare three distinct sexualities. Homosexuals are adults who have same-sex attraction to other adults. Heterosexuals are adults who are sexually attracted to the opposite sex. Pedophiles are adults who are sexually attracted to prepubescent children or children in the early stages of puberty. The reason why Jerry Sandusky isn't referred to as a "homosexual pedophile" isn't to placate the gay community, it is because homosexual-pedophile and heterosexual-pedophile are not proper scientific terms.
Why does it matter if Sandusky's a homosexual or not? It'd be just as bad if the victims were girls.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GoSU96 - You'll not be able to reason with these people. Their blood is up because of the horrific nature of the crime.
Sounds like Political Correctness to me, not science.
Let me see if I have this straight. Homosexuals are attracted to the same sex ... like Jerry Sandusky.
Homosexuals perform sex acts --- I am told --- like the one that McQeery thinks he saw.
But because his partners or victims were underage, he's not a homosexual but a pedophile. In spite of the fact that no girls were ever involved.
And you buy this??"
And - I know plenty of women who have experienced the act that McQueery walked in on.