Townie72
All American
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 5,905
- Like
- 6,451
When a team starts getting open shots on every possession the coach has to make a choice:
- option 1: stick with their D and hope that the other team will miss wide open shots
- option 2: change something with their existing D to hopefully stop what's working
- option 3: switch to a new D entirely
That exact thought process is what got Duke to start playing zone last night... they were getting killed in man 2 man as they couldn't stay in front of the Ducks and Oregon wasn't missing the dunks and layups they were getting. There was no option 2 as Coach K has zero depth this year so he opted for the zone.
It's never been clear to me why our coach, or any coach for that matter, would limit themselves to option 1 and 2 only when they are clearly not working. And I don't want to hear "but but we never practice man 2 man"... these kids have been playing man 2 man since they stepped on a basketball court. You just need to decide whether or not you're switching screens or not. To me trying the same thing that doesn't work over and over is just plain old stubbornness. No excuse for it.
Well, I'll grant you this. You really don't understand.
Boeheim's reasons for using the Zone are very different from K's in the scenario you painted.
One problem you have is a belief that M2M is better at defending long range shooters. As long as you keep hanging on to that mistaken belief, you'll continued to be baffled.
Add to this, a belief that a team doesn't have to practice M2M to play it.
The stubbornness you see is a failure of people --- Boeheim, in this case --- to agree with you.
It's not necessary that JB's logic be clear to you. It's only necessary that it be clear to him.