Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="kingottoiii, post: 333862"] I think right now it is both. The OL is certainly holding the O back from being mediocre. The question is can the O be more than mediocre with this system? IMO for this O to be Top 40 we need a decent OL and playmakers at the skill positions. Asking to have that at a school like SU is asking too much IMO. IN CFB every year you need to replace 1/3 to 1/2 of your starting O. There is constant turnover. To expect to get the required players year in and year out for this O to be consistently successful is crazy IMO. Especially with the limited practice time you get in CFB. If you have talent any O can be successful. When you don't have a ton of talent then you need a system that maximizes what you have. IMO the system we saw in 2010 and 2011 did not and will not do that. [/QUOTE]