Knicks411
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 14,002
- Like
- 12,874
Who cares what the respective ratings were? This is an example of where looking at the numbers doesn't tell the interpretive story. KU played man to man, often full court, which played right into UK's up-tempo hands. Whereas we would have played a style that would have been [1] unfamiliar to them, and [2] wouldn't have ratcheted up the tempo.
Now, if Kentucky had hit all of those threes that they did against Kansas, nobody would beat them. The question is: would they have hit them all against us, or even had those same looks?
Please note that I'm not suggesting that we WOULD have beaten them, just that I believe that we COULD have. We were one of the few teams that year that could have.
Yeah I don't think we're very far off. I would have favored UK, but we definitely would have had a chance.
The unfamiliar style would have been a positive in our favor, no question.
Which also brings up a somewhat related point; I think Gasaway wrote an article on ESPN a few months back (I'm sure it was linked here) saying that we might outperform a little, so to speak, this year, since we're facing a ton of teams and coaches that haven't played our zone before. Or at least not on an every year basis.