Because the Georgetown player could run the baseline, partially negating the benefit of a in bounds defender. Or so I read.He does this super fast probability math computing in his brain. He knows it backwards and forwards and always plays the odds. I am sure that almost feral computation ability is why he didn’t have a player guard the Gtown inbounder (is that the right term?) with 2.8 seconds left.
Always knew he was really good in close games, but he is literally the best of coaches involved in 150 games or more decided by 5 points or less.
Glad someone did this research.
Did you hear the one about the constipated basketball coach?It took years to develop the slide rule but a fine slide rule it is.
I think hes one of the two meshed names, right above the dotted red .500 line, and to the left of the 87.5 game line (above Kevin Willard & to the right of Nickelberry)Great find and cool data. Surprising where K and Pitino fall. Roy Williams significantly better than both of them on this metric. Didn't find Tony Bennett with a quick scan. Anybody locate him?
Always knew he was really good in close games, but he is literally the best of coaches involved in 150 games or more decided by 5 points or less.
Glad someone did this research.
Always knew he was really good in close games, but he is literally the best of coaches involved in 150 games or more decided by 5 points or less.
Glad someone did this research.
Always knew he was really good in close games, but he is literally the best of coaches involved in 150 games or more decided by 5 points or less.
Glad someone did this research.
awesome find and impossible to argue with the results. In Jimmy we trust!
No shat!Did you hear the one about the constipated basketball coach?
ha ha very true. I was going to put "although I know some will" in the message“Impossible to argue with...(anything)” man how long you been around these parts?
YesAre you CusefanJake on Twitter?
Yes