Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hungrychuck, post: 2414614, member: 389"] This is exactly right. It's easy to see why Trevor was polarizing. He had a significant record of performance/accomplishment for people to pick over and draw their own conclusions. I don't think Frank has done enough at SU for there to be a serious "pro" side of the argument, and so therefore not polarizing. Yes, he has shown some hints of improvement this year, which have been duly noted, and one must hope that those blossom into consistently better play. But I think it's more accurate to describe a "down on Frank" group and a second group that is trying to remain open-minded and optimistic while watching Frank through cracks in the fingers over their eyes. [/QUOTE]