Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Orangezoo, post: 4232882, member: 237"]
MPG helps if you want to look at per 40. I think aggregate production is more the point here. Efficiency points to future benefit but pure production is what we need hence my comment about the 40 to 50 pts. We also need to bring down opponent scoring to the low 60s again like better defensive years.

In a non veteran scenario I think we need to see:

Mintz at 12/4 , Joe at 15/3, Symir at 5/4, Jesse at 15 and 7, Benny at 10/5. That would be a plus 29. Thus then from two other frosh and Ballard( guessing) we need around 12-15 pts and 6 boards a game. Let me add that I'm  referencing just to replace last year as best possible. We need to improve our scoring defense a lot for getting to that point to mean something in wins and losses.

In the above scenario one veteran can likely get you most of the way with the other frosh adding on top.

To me this class needs to be the 2015 class just bigger. If that works out, given we did rely heavily on two frosh that year and this year it would likely be 3 without a vet then we are in good shape. The 247 numbers provide precedent for that possibility. So again I am speaking to preference but not saying possibilities aren't there.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?