Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="richmondcuse03, post: 5200669, member: 984"] It would but I suspect the cost of building into the side of the Dome, as originally contemplated, is cost prohibitive compared to the South campus plan. I agree that walking to the Dome is preferred for a hotel but the only other way to do that is to take away more parking by the Dome and build it in one of the lots. I think it would work well but people get so annoyed anytime we lose parking...Not sure what other land they could acquire near the campus. South is just very logical and would make sense given long term housing plans to have all students on North. [/QUOTE]