Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="orangebabe, post: 1414981, member: 329"] We don't need a pg for '15, but we need one for '16? Why's that? KJ and the frosh will be upperclassmen and be more experienced. G may be our best option this year, but he is not a natural pg and will only be playing there out of necessity. We need a true pg, and pushing the sanctions back would not really mean giving anything up for '16, because we would simply be taking that schollie for '15 anyway with Murray. Also, as I mentioned, I believe without a doubt that either KJ or CO will transfer or DC will enter the draft or forego his last year of eligibility. This would open up another schollie for a potential '16 recruit, not to mention I anticipate getting at least 1 back with the appeal process. This is a no brainer imho. [/QUOTE]