CousCuse
Comin in Hot
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2013
- Messages
- 12,041
- Like
- 9,132
There is no doubt that all kinds of scheme's are being employed.Just launder it
There is no doubt that all kinds of scheme's are being employed.Just launder it
If the coaches don’t want that player then he’s not coming here. Just seems a bit controlling to be telling donors how to spend their own money.What if the coaches don't want that player? Or, certainly don't want that player to get whatever money the donor is offering because it will upset other players on the team? Making it difficult to have team unity or keeping other players next year?
So by keeping JB on the payroll we’re preventing one of our biggest potential donors from contributing NIL. Awesome.I can answer that for you. Simple answer is they can’t. Coaches and athletic administrators cannot donate to collectives but can participate in fundraising activities.
If Red is the gatekeeper then who is the key master?Concerning the university's involvement with NIL, it's been widely assumed here that Red is the gatekeeper. That is, he'd be the one to direct the NIL groups to blow the account for a player, or not.
It seems like that's probably how it works. If so, Red would be the one doing the ROI analysis.
Yeah, I kind of get that though. If I was rolling in cash and could pay for a player or two, I'd want input rather than just donating it without any involvement. That said, I know that would complicate things for the coaching staff.From what I have been told, there was a donor who wanted to direct his money to who he wanted. Not who the coaches wanted. Of course Red should be doing the ROI.
Coaches can't contribute to collectives. They can do events and appear at fund raising events. At least that was the rule back when the collectives started. I don't believe that has changedDash do you know, can coaches contribute to a collective personally? Like could Red donate to Orange United?
Billionaire Niastri:Yeah, I kind of get that though. If I was rolling in cash and could pay for a player or two, I'd want input rather than just donating it without any involvement. That said, I know that would complicate things for the coaching staff.
Just launder it
Unless I say I'm willing to give Judah a million and Red doesn't want him.Billionaire Niastri:
Hi, Mr. Cooper Flagg? I'd really like you to be the face of the Niastri Foundation... It's worth $5 million a year. Yes, you say? Let me introduce you to a man named Red Autry. Did I mention the promos are only filmed in Syracuse?
The problems arise only when a guy thinks his mere $500k annual contribution let's him pick the players.
A “mere” 500k per year? Not saying I would do it because the staff evaluates talent far better than me, but given recent results, I don’t take issue with anyone donating 500k per year making sure the money isnt lit on fire by being given to Benny or an underwhelming transfer just to miss the tournament for the 4th straight year.Billionaire Niastri:
Hi, Mr. Cooper Flagg? I'd really like you to be the face of the Niastri Foundation... It's worth $5 million a year. Yes, you say? Let me introduce you to a man named Red Autry. Did I mention the promos are only filmed in Syracuse?
The problems arise only when a guy thinks his mere $500k annual contribution let's him pick the players.
There are dudes getting low major jobs by basically doing that. DIY NIL. I'm totally fine with it. Coaches wouldn't be chit without their players so if they have want to hand them some money go for it. No different than coming from a collective.Just launder it
Of course it is controlling. And it should be. They run the program. Not some donor. If they don't want to follow the program, they can spend their money some place else. The coaches know where they want the money spent. Not some donor. When I send money to St Judes, I don't tell their researchers what experiments the money should be spent on. Or anything else I send money to.If the coaches don’t want that player then he’s not coming here. Just seems a bit controlling to be telling donors how to spend their own money.
I believe as others said Autry is still the ultimate gatekeeper. I also believe Autry wants Kadary as well as the big NIL / alumni out there.A “mere” 500k per year? Not saying I would do it because the staff evaluates talent far better than me, but given recent results, I don’t take issue with anyone donating 500k per year making sure the money isnt lit on fire by being given to Benny or an underwhelming transfer just to miss the tournament for the 4th straight year.
Now if they’re going rogue and trying to recruit players against Red’s wishes that’s unacceptable. But wanting names run by you before committing your money isn’t as bad as it’s made seem. Once the program starts winning big then they will probably trust the process more.
If Red deserves his job, he'll have you paying a player he wants $1.2 million before the meeting is over.Unless I say I'm willing to give Judah a million and Red doesn't want him.
Yeah but it would be pretty crazy to turn down a player like Richmond don’t you think? I’m not impressed by the time it is taking staff to put this team together with the portal this season. Not what I thought would be happening.Of course it is controlling. And it should be. They run the program. Not some donor. If they don't want to follow the program, they can spend their money some place else. The coaches know where they want the money spent. Not some donor. When I send money to St Judes, I don't tell their researchers what experiments the money should be spent on. Or anything else I send money to.
If Red is the gatekeeper then who is the key master?
Yeah but it would be pretty crazy to turn down a player like Richmond don’t you think? I’m not impressed by the time it is taking staff to put this team together with the portal this season. Not what I thought would be happening.
If the coaches don’t want that player then he’s not coming here. Just seems a bit controlling to be telling donors how to spend their own money.
Not impressed? We added a center, a forward and a guard. What did you expect?Yeah but it would be pretty crazy to turn down a player like Richmond don’t you think? I’m not impressed by the time it is taking staff to put this team together with the portal this season. Not what I thought would be happening.
We added a back up PGNot impressed? We added a center, a forward and a guard. What did you expect?
Well, I know the coaches don't know as much as you do about hoop. That is a given. But they like the kid a lot. And not for nothing, the portal window to add isn't over.We added a back up PG
To that point Eric musselman, Caliponzi and Pope have added more players while transitioning to other schools.Yeah but it would be pretty crazy to turn down a player like Richmond don’t you think? I’m not impressed by the time it is taking staff to put this team together with the portal this season. Not what I thought would be happening.
Repole lost the Derby today. Maybe that will affect his contribution to the Kadary to St. John's NIL.
Didn't bet his horse just for that reasonRepole lost the Derby today. Maybe that will affect his contribution to the Kadary to St. John's NIL.