Well, again, you're giving GMAC credit for things that haven't happened yet by saying Doty will win MAAC rookie of the year, without there being any sense of what winning that award actually means, yet using that as evidence of Red's inability to identify talent. You also said that Doty would play significant minutes for us and "at least" be our 6th man. Which, maybe, but that's unknowable, and is something you're giving credit to GMAC for at Red's expense.
And this is why I don't find what you're posting to be credible. Your bias to GMAC is so extensive that you're nowhere close to objectivity. You give GMAC credit for hypothetical achievements, but you don't stop there - you then subjectively stack up these points in favor of GMAC against Red. And you're not conscious of it. You've asked me several times now for me to show you where you're doing what I've described, and I quote it directly in your posts.
Like if you're just a die hard GMAC fan that's fine, but it's weird on SYRACUSEfan.com to take frequent opportunities to shine a spotlight on Siena basketball as an excuse to dump on Red using made up assertions.
Siena is a program with a losing record that's a better record than they had last year. That's the objective statement. If you want to sing their praises for it, fine. If you want to praise GMAC for it as a former Orange, fine.
But if you are going to talk negatively about the program and our actual head coach using made up stuff, I'm going to call it out. There are plenty of valid criticisms right now without spinning into the world of fiction as you do.
