Take all the offense you want. The fact remains there are players that were instrumental to our program that should be honored before GMac. Without those players maybe GMac never plays here. It's not even about whether GMac meant more or less to the program. It's about the fact that honoring the guys that came before him is long overdo. Is it GMac's fault that the school is behind in honoring those guys? No. Is it a travesty that a guy still in his 20's waits a little longer so that players that paved the way for him and are now in their 40's and 50's get their turn first? Absolutely not. It's the way it should be. Just because Melo was honored when he was doesn't automatically mean it's GMac's turn right now. People have made sound arguments that hanging Melo's jersey should've happened later.I take offense to this... sometimes the problem with old farts is that they believe young people are too naive. Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe, some of the new generation of sports personas actually could have been better than the old? Too many times the legend of a player that played long ago is believed to hold higher court than someone who played less than a decade ago, only because it feels too fresh. I don't disagree that some of the legends absolutely deserve to be up on the wall. I just don't think it fair of you or anyone to say us "younger" fans are too naive to discuss things of this nature because we weren't around when so-and-so did such-and-such. I assume I just read the tone of that message the wrong way.
Carmelo is on the wall because he was the leader on a national championship team. GMac was very instrumental in that tourney run as well averaging 13.3 pts, 3.5 assists and 2.5 stl per game as a true freshman.
I think they had three go in the first round following that season and two the next. That team was absolutely stacked. Did we have anyone other than Wallace go in the first round? Our guys played over their heads just to keep it close. I loved that '96 team.I don't think we win the UK game even with Wallace down the stretch. They had more horses than us plain and simple. They were likely to wear us down even if Wallace never fouled out. I think that team Ricky P had that day boasted 9-10 guys who at least stayed in the league for a cup of coffee.
I think they had three go in the first round following that season and two the next. That team was absolutely stacked. Did we have anyone other than Wallace go in the first round? Our guys played over their heads just to keep it close. I loved that '96 team.
Did we have anyone other than Wallace go in the first round?
Only Wallace. I think that squad was:
Sims,
Cipola
Wallace
Burgan
Hill
with
Reifschnieder
Janulis
and someone else off the bench. Been quite a while. I agree we played great to be in that game and UK was seriously stacked.
We were only down by 5 when Wallace fouled out.
Z makes a better pass, Wallace scores and gets fouled, and now we're only down by only 2 with about a minute left. :noidea:
Ok, it's been 8.5 years since GMAC went out like a boss in the Big East tourney, ending a very memorable career as an Orange. His career needs no introduction as he was definitely the most beloved Syracuse basketball player I can remember (I'm 32) and arguably ever. He embodied everything the University, City and Fans could ever ask for. Hell, his senior day introduction is the first time I think I've ever teared up.
To the powers that be - Retire the damn jersey!
I take offense to this... sometimes the problem with old farts is that they believe young people are too naive. Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe, some of the new generation of sports personas actually could have been better than the old? Too many times the legend of a player that played long ago is believed to hold higher court than someone who played less than a decade ago, only because it feels too fresh. I don't disagree that some of the legends absolutely deserve to be up on the wall. I just don't think it fair of you or anyone to say us "younger" fans are too naive to discuss things of this nature because we weren't around when so-and-so did such-and-such. I assume I just read the tone of that message the wrong way.
Carmelo is on the wall because he was the leader on a national championship team. GMac was very instrumental in that tourney run as well averaging 13.3 pts, 3.5 assists and 2.5 stl per game as a true freshman.
He made six 3-pointers in the first half and several key foul shots in the final minutes. His NC performance was probably the best single performance of any Orange player I've ever seen. But we would not have won the game without Anthony. And Warrick's block at the end is still the single greatest play I've seen in Orange history.
We were only down by 5 when Wallace fouled out.
Z makes a better pass, Wallace scores and gets fouled, and now we're only down by only 2 with about a minute left. :noidea:
He made six 3-pointers in the first half and several key foul shots in the final minutes. His NC performance was probably the best single performance of any Orange player I've ever seen. But we would not have won the game without Anthony. And Warrick's block at the end is still the single greatest play I've seen in Orange history.
I take offense to this... sometimes the problem with old farts is that they believe young people are too naive. Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe, some of the new generation of sports personas actually could have been better than the old? Too many times the legend of a player that played long ago is believed to hold higher court than someone who played less than a decade ago, only because it feels too fresh. I don't disagree that some of the legends absolutely deserve to be up on the wall. I just don't think it fair of you or anyone to say us "younger" fans are too naive to discuss things of this nature because we weren't around when so-and-so did such-and-such. I assume I just read the tone of that message the wrong way.
Carmelo is on the wall because he was the leader on a national championship team. GMac was very instrumental in that tourney run as well averaging 13.3 pts, 3.5 assists and 2.5 stl per game as a true freshman.
OrangeDW said:Carmelo had 20 points, 10 rebounds, and 7 assists in the title game.
As exciting and important and incredible as GMac's 6 first half 3's were, Carmelo played the better game.
Crazy thing about that game is Gmac did not score in the 2nd half after hurting his hand near the end of the first half. And due to Melo's back acting up, he did not score in the final 12+ minutes. It was a total team effort that led to that win.
It was great to watch that again! The Cipolla play is the one I still recall to this day.John Wallace is responsible for not only leading the '96 team to a near upset of Kentucky for the national championship, he is responsible for two of the greatest clutch plays in 'Cuse history: the perfect pass from out-of-bounds at midcourt to Cipolla for a great shot at the buzzer to tie Georgia in the Sweet 16 and send the game in OT, then JW ended the game by doing this; my voice was shot for a day or two.
I won't sit by and listen to anyone put anything remotely resembling blame on Z. The reason we lost that game, if you ask me, was because we simply didn't have another ball handler so when he hurt his wrist late, we turned it over on 6 of the 7 possessions he was getting checked out on the sideline. With Z in there I legit think we have a shot to win at the end.We were only down by 5 when Wallace fouled out.
Z makes a better pass, Wallace scores and gets fouled, and now we're only down by only 2 with about a minute left. :noidea: