Good news bad news 3p shooting | Syracusefan.com

Good news bad news 3p shooting

Millhouse

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
30,523
Like
38,313
Good news!
Our two shooters are shooting 42% from three in conference

Bad news
They only take 41% of three pointers in conference play

Remember when they talked about analytics

Maybe they could just get someone with a trac phone or access to a public library
 
So, for context (open to all sorts of criticism, etc.):

Over the last four games, they have attempted 17, 27, 30, and 25 3PFG. That’s 99/4 games, or 25 3PFGA/game.

Given the provided percentages, if we have 25 3PFGA, our “two shooters” would, on average, account for 10 3PFGA and 4 made 3PFG.

But, if they took 60% of the 3PFGA, then they would, on average, be expected to make 6 3PFG. That is +6 points!

Going a little further, if they took 70% (72% to be exact=18 shots), then they would, on average, be expected to make 7.5 3PFG. That is +10.5 points!

It’s an interesting thought exercise to say, “What if…?” And the above is an imprecise illustration attempting to answer that question. At the very least, it is another opportunity to ask the other, and much bigger question: Where is the coaching?

Thanks Millhouse, this was a welcome distraction for my Wednesday afternoon!
 
why is everyone talking about hopkins?

is he the next coach? (please tell me im hallcuinating)
Apparently Carmelo loves Hop...so he might be Hoppin back our way...Or this could be Dan Mullen part 2
 
So, for context (open to all sorts of criticism, etc.):

Over the last four games, they have attempted 17, 27, 30, and 25 3PFG. That’s 99/4 games, or 25 3PFGA/game.

Given the provided percentages, if we have 25 3PFGA, our “two shooters” would, on average, account for 10 3PFGA and 4 made 3PFG.

But, if they took 60% of the 3PFGA, then they would, on average, be expected to make 6 3PFG. That is +6 points!

Going a little further, if they took 70% (72% to be exact=18 shots), then they would, on average, be expected to make 7.5 3PFG. That is +10.5 points!

It’s an interesting thought exercise to say, “What if…?” And the above is an imprecise illustration attempting to answer that question. At the very least, it is another opportunity to ask the other, and much bigger question: Where is the coaching?

Thanks Millhouse, this was a welcome distraction for my Wednesday afternoon!
they're choosing to be terrible
the low hanging fruit is not even hanging, it's in their hand already and they just throw it way
 
So, for context (open to all sorts of criticism, etc.):

Over the last four games, they have attempted 17, 27, 30, and 25 3PFG. That’s 99/4 games, or 25 3PFGA/game.

Given the provided percentages, if we have 25 3PFGA, our “two shooters” would, on average, account for 10 3PFGA and 4 made 3PFG.

But, if they took 60% of the 3PFGA, then they would, on average, be expected to make 6 3PFG. That is +6 points!

Going a little further, if they took 70% (72% to be exact=18 shots), then they would, on average, be expected to make 7.5 3PFG. That is +10.5 points!

It’s an interesting thought exercise to say, “What if…?” And the above is an imprecise illustration attempting to answer that question. At the very least, it is another opportunity to ask the other, and much bigger question: Where is the coaching?

Thanks Millhouse, this was a welcome distraction for my Wednesday afternoon!
The other guys aren't shooting zero percent so it wouldnt be that big a difference. 2;or 3 pts a game

If they replaced the worst 3 point shot attempts the other guys take, maybe a little more
 
The other guys aren't shooting zero percent so it wouldnt be that big a difference. 2;or 3 pts a game

If they replaced the worst 3 point shot attempts the other guys take, maybe a little more
Thank you! I knew it wouldn’t be just a straight substitution, but I couldn’t get out of my own way when trying to calculate the actual difference. NOW it makes better sense to me!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,768
Messages
5,286,594
Members
6,199
Latest member
CDcuse22

Online statistics

Members online
106
Guests online
5,740
Total visitors
5,846


Top Bottom